Power by county
Wolfe, KY: data center power outlook
For Wolfe, Kentucky, the public grid picture begins with its place in the PJM market (PJM Interconnection) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Wolfe tops out at 69 kV, over a footprint of 3 mapped substations. In Wolfe, 4 utilities share the retail territory, among them CLARK ENERGY COOP INC - (KY), EAST KENTUCKY POWER COOP, INC, JACKSON ENERGY COOP CORP - (KY).
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- CLARK ENERGY COOP INC - (KY), EAST KENTUCKY POWER COOP, INC, JACKSON ENERGY COOP CORP - (KY), LICKING VALLEY RURAL E C C
- ISO / market
- PJM (PJM Interconnection)
- Highest grid access
- 69 kV
- Substations in county
- 3
- Industrial retail rate
- 7.0¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 3 of 4 serving utilities: 8.1 to 8.8¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 716 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 0.7 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 26,012 employed in construction within ~120 km (41 of 53 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Wolfe
For Wolfe, Kentucky, the following sections turn public grid records into a siting-oriented summary. Wolfe reaches 69 kV at most, which is sub-transmission and typically feeds distribution circuits. Wolfe, Kentucky contains 3 mapped substations, a sparse footprint that concentrates interconnection options at a few points.
For Wolfe, the PJM market (PJM Interconnection) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 7.0 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Wolfe at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Wolfe that publish a rate range 3 of 4 serving utilities: 8.1 to 8.8¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
Wolfe, Kentucky shows no interconnection-queue project in the covered feeds, whether from real quiet or a feed not yet loaded. No generation is filed as planned or under construction in Wolfe, Kentucky in the federal EIA-860M inventory, a measured zero rather than missing data. Grid carbon intensity for Wolfe, via its balancing authority, is 716.09 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Wolfe at 0.71 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Wolfe, about 26,012 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Wolfe figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Wolfe, Kentucky qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Wolfe, Kentucky turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Wolfe, Kentucky traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.