Power by county
Worcester, MD: data center power outlook
For Worcester, Maryland, the public grid picture begins with its place in the PJM market (PJM Interconnection) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Worcester tops out at 138 kV, over a footprint of 18 mapped substations. In Worcester, 5 utilities share the retail territory, among them A & N ELECTRIC COOP, CHOPTANK ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC, DELAWARE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- A & N ELECTRIC COOP, CHOPTANK ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC, DELAWARE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, DELMARVA POWER, TOWN OF BERLIN - (MD)
- ISO / market
- PJM (PJM Interconnection)
- Highest grid access
- 138 kV
- Substations in county
- 18
- Industrial retail rate
- 12.5¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 2 of 5 serving utilities: 3.7 to 11.1¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 716 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 16 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 24,753 employed in construction within ~120 kmA large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Worcester
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Worcester, Maryland that bears on a large new load. The strongest mapped access in Worcester is 138 kV, squarely transmission class. Worcester carries 18 substations in the mapped layer, spread across the county.
For Worcester, the PJM market (PJM Interconnection) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 12.5 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Worcester at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Worcester that publish a rate range 2 of 5 serving utilities: 3.7 to 11.1¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
Worcester, Maryland shows no interconnection-queue project in the covered feeds, whether from real quiet or a feed not yet loaded. No generation is filed as planned or under construction in Worcester, Maryland in the federal EIA-860M inventory, a measured zero rather than missing data. Grid carbon intensity for Worcester, via its balancing authority, is 716.09 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Worcester at 15.57 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Worcester, about 24,753 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Worcester figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Worcester, Maryland qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Worcester, Maryland turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Worcester, Maryland traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.