Power by county
Carver, MN: data center power outlook
For Carver, Minnesota, the public grid picture begins with its place in the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Carver tops out at 230 kV, over a footprint of 25 mapped substations. In Carver, 7 utilities share the retail territory, among them CITY OF CHASKA - (MN), CITY OF ST PAUL - (NE), MCLEOD COOPERATIVE POWER ASSN.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- CITY OF CHASKA - (MN), CITY OF ST PAUL - (NE), MCLEOD COOPERATIVE POWER ASSN, MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP, NORTHERN STATES POWER CO - MINNESOTA, SHAKOPEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM, WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELEC ASSN
- ISO / market
- MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator)
- Highest grid access
- 230 kV
- Substations in county
- 25
- Industrial retail rate
- 9.3¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 4 of 7 serving utilities: 9.7 to 12.9¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- 2 projects, 180 MW
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 982 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 11 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 114,495 employed in construction within ~120 kmA large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Carver
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Carver, Minnesota that bears on a large new load. The strongest mapped access in Carver is 230 kV, squarely transmission class. Carver carries 25 substations, a dense footprint across the county.
For Carver, the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 9.3 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Carver at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Carver that publish a rate range 4 of 7 serving utilities: 9.7 to 12.9¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
On record for Carver are 2 interconnection-queue projects, totalling 180 MW of requested capacity. The federal EIA-860M inventory files no planned or under-construction generation in Carver, Minnesota, a real zero rather than a gap. Grid carbon intensity for Carver, via its balancing authority, is 981.982 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Carver at 10.84 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Carver, about 114,495 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Carver figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Carver, Minnesota qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Carver, Minnesota turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Carver, Minnesota traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.