Power by county
Washington, MS: data center power outlook
For Washington, Mississippi, the public grid picture begins with its place in the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Washington tops out at 230 kV, over a footprint of 19 mapped substations. In Washington, 6 utilities share the retail territory, among them ASHLEY CHICOT ELEC COOP, INC, CITY OF LELAND - (MS), DELTA ELECTRIC POWER ASSN.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- ASHLEY CHICOT ELEC COOP, INC, CITY OF LELAND - (MS), DELTA ELECTRIC POWER ASSN, ENTERGY ARKANSAS LLC, ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI LLC, TWIN COUNTY ELECTRIC PWR ASSN
- ISO / market
- MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator)
- Highest grid access
- 230 kV
- Substations in county
- 19
- Industrial retail rate
- 7.4¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 2 of 6 serving utilities: 8.3 to 13.8¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- 11 projects, 2,070 MW
- Proposed generation
- 1,019 MW planned or under constructionUnits filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 982 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 315 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 10,710 employed in construction within ~120 km (24 of 27 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Washington
For Washington, Mississippi, the following sections turn public grid records into a siting-oriented summary. The strongest mapped access in Washington is 230 kV, squarely transmission class. Washington carries 19 substations in the mapped layer, spread across the county.
For Washington, the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 7.4 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Washington at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Washington that publish a rate range 2 of 6 serving utilities: 8.3 to 13.8¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
On record for Washington are 11 interconnection-queue projects, totalling 2,070 MW of requested capacity. Federal filings (EIA-860M) list 1,018.7 MW of generation as planned or under construction in Washington. Grid carbon intensity for Washington, via its balancing authority, is 981.982 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Washington at 315.1 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Washington, about 10,710 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Washington figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Washington, Mississippi qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Washington, Mississippi turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Washington, Mississippi traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.