Power by county
Iron, MO: data center power outlook
For Iron, Missouri, the public grid picture begins with its place in an area outside an organized wholesale market and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Iron tops out at 138 kV, over a footprint of 13 mapped substations. In Iron, 4 utilities share the retail territory, among them BLACK RIVER ELECTRIC COOP - (MO), CITY OF SALEM - (MO), CRAWFORD ELECTRIC COOP, INC.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- BLACK RIVER ELECTRIC COOP - (MO), CITY OF SALEM - (MO), CRAWFORD ELECTRIC COOP, INC, UNION ELECTRIC CO - (MO)
- ISO / market
- NON_ISO (Not in an organized wholesale market)
- Highest grid access
- 138 kV
- Substations in county
- 13
- Industrial retail rate
- 8.4¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 3 of 4 serving utilities: 7.2 to 7.6¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- 2 projects, 180 MW
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 982 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 2.7 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 17,434 employed in construction within ~120 km (24 of 26 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Iron
For Iron, Missouri, the following sections turn public grid records into a siting-oriented summary. The strongest mapped access in Iron is 138 kV, squarely transmission class. Iron carries 13 substations in the mapped layer, spread across the county.
Iron, Missouri lies outside an organized wholesale market, so generation and transmission are arranged bilaterally and through the local utility rather than a central market operator. The state industrial average retail rate is 8.4 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Iron at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Iron that publish a rate range 3 of 4 serving utilities: 7.2 to 7.6¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
On record for Iron are 2 interconnection-queue projects, totalling 180 MW of requested capacity. No generation is filed as planned or under construction in Iron, Missouri in the federal EIA-860M inventory, a measured zero rather than missing data. Grid carbon intensity for Iron, via its balancing authority, is 981.982 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Iron at 2.67 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Iron, about 17,434 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Iron figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Iron, Missouri qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Iron, Missouri turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Iron, Missouri traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.