Power by county
Wells, ND: data center power outlook
For Wells, North Dakota, the public grid picture begins with its place in the SPP market (Southwest Power Pool) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Wells tops out at 345 kV, over a footprint of 16 mapped substations. In Wells, 6 utilities share the retail territory, among them BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOP, MONTANA-DAKOTA UTILITIES CO, NORTHERN PLAINS ELECTRIC COOP.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOP, MONTANA-DAKOTA UTILITIES CO, NORTHERN PLAINS ELECTRIC COOP, OTTER TAIL POWER CO, VERENDRYE ELECTRIC COOP INC, WAPA-- WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
- ISO / market
- SPP (Southwest Power Pool)
- Highest grid access
- 345 kV
- Substations in county
- 16
- Industrial retail rate
- 7.5¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 6 serving utilities: 1.1 to 8.4¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 872 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 1.0 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 4,995 employed in construction within ~120 km (12 of 14 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Wells
For Wells, North Dakota, the following sections turn public grid records into a siting-oriented summary. The highest mapped voltage in Wells is 345 kV, in the high-voltage transmission class. Wells carries 16 substations in the mapped layer, spread across the county.
For Wells, the SPP market (Southwest Power Pool) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 7.5 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Wells at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Wells that publish a rate range 6 serving utilities: 1.1 to 8.4¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
Wells, North Dakota shows no interconnection-queue project in the covered feeds, whether from real quiet or a feed not yet loaded. No generation is filed as planned or under construction in Wells, North Dakota in the federal EIA-860M inventory, a measured zero rather than missing data. Grid carbon intensity for Wells, via its balancing authority, is 871.526 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Wells at 1.02 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Wells, about 4,995 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Wells figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Wells, North Dakota qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Wells, North Dakota turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Wells, North Dakota traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.