Power by county
Harrison, TX: data center power outlook
For Harrison, Texas, the public grid picture begins with its place in the SPP market (Southwest Power Pool) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Harrison tops out at 345 kV, over a footprint of 39 mapped substations. In Harrison, 8 utilities share the retail territory, among them CHEROKEE COUNTY ELEC COOP ASSN, DEEP EAST TEXAS ELEC COOP INC, PANOLA-HARRISON ELEC COOP, INC.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- CHEROKEE COUNTY ELEC COOP ASSN, DEEP EAST TEXAS ELEC COOP INC, PANOLA-HARRISON ELEC COOP, INC, RUSK COUNTY ELECTRIC COOP, INC, SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA E M C, SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER CO, UPSHUR RURAL ELEC COOP CORP, WOOD COUNTY ELECTRIC COOP, INC
- ISO / market
- SPP (Southwest Power Pool)
- Highest grid access
- 345 kV
- Substations in county
- 39
- Industrial retail rate
- 6.5¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 6 of 8 serving utilities: 5.6 to 7.7¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- 450 MW planned or under constructionUnits filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 872 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 25 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 32,546 employed in construction within ~120 kmA large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Harrison
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Harrison, Texas that bears on a large new load. The highest mapped voltage in Harrison is 345 kV, in the high-voltage transmission class. Harrison carries 39 substations, a dense footprint across the county.
For Harrison, the SPP market (Southwest Power Pool) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 6.5 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Harrison at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Harrison that publish a rate range 6 of 8 serving utilities: 5.6 to 7.7¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
Harrison, Texas has nothing in the interconnection queue across the feeds covered here, quiet or uningested. Federal filings (EIA-860M) list 450 MW of generation as planned or under construction in Harrison. Grid carbon intensity for Harrison, via its balancing authority, is 871.526 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Harrison at 24.69 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Harrison, about 32,546 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Harrison figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Harrison, Texas qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Harrison, Texas turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Harrison, Texas traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.